Re: Scope Quality Question

Thanks. Since when are Swift scopes sold? I wonder if they were better in
the past.

Gregor

"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_4eae.11012$sp3.6911@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "GTO" <gregor_o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:75%9e.1880$zX7.663@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> What scopes are recommended by this group?
>>
>> There are those, who proclaim that everything besides Zeiss, Leitz (now
>> Leica), Nikon or Olympus is junk. And there are those who recommend the
>> "big" names in microscopy without entirely stepping other scopes into the
>> ground.
>>
>> You are asking about the differences between a $500 and $5000 scope, one
>> made by Swift and the other one made by, for instance, Olympus.
>>
>> I will now assume that your Swift is as well built as my old PZO from
>> 1975. So, it is not junk and actually useful for microscopy.
>>
>> What would you realize when working with your new $5000 toy:
>>
>> 1) You have less money left on your bank account.
>> 2) If you are married, your wife will purchase shoes for an additional
>> $4500 just to compensate for your crazy expenditure.
>> 3) All your microscopy friends don't talk with you anymore since your
>> scope is better (see below).
>> 4) You are too much afraid of really using it since you would never be
>> able to pay for repairs (...just kidding!).
>> 5) You are always cleaning the scope and believe that with extensive
>> cleaning you actually add value until you realize that you actually
>> degrade optical performance through excessive cleaning.
>> 6) Every gear works precise and smooth. It's ergonomical and you just
>> feel the stability and comfort when working with your new $5000 toy. You
>> just have to look at it and your heart glows.
>> 7) The illumination (including condenser) is far better.
>> 8) The optics has more contrast and, if you purchased more expensive
>> gears, has also more resolution.
>> 9) You can expand the scope (if you have some money left or win in the
>> lottery!).
>> 10) You can mount a heavier camera on the frame and your stage does not
>> start to drift when attaching a phase-slider condenser.
>>
>> Yes, you can see and feel a difference.
>>
>> BTW, stay away from the entry level scopes of the big names. If you want
>> to save a bundle, embrace the used market patiently. Or just stick with
>> your Swift if you are happy with it.
>>
>> Gregor
>>
>> "Charles" <ckraft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1ftg61553ntbai7v4i7n6jre5jq15uvgmh@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> years ago I bought a Swift microscope. It 9is apparently one of the
>>> Chinese brands.
>>>
>>> What am I missing? what difference would I see with one of the scopes
>>> recommended in this group.
>>>
>>> I'm strictly an amateur, no training at all.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Charles
>>>
>>> Does not play well with others.
>>
> As always a good post! The big problem with Swift is it doesn't
> mamufacture a thing. They come up with what they want and they ask
> vendors to bid on it. For some *&^%$ reason I worked on a bunch of
> Swifts. It was plain as day that one group was made by one company and
> the others by a second company. All of them had the same model
> designation.
>
> Kevin Cunningham
> SMS
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Scope Quality Question
    ... Japaneses Swift scopes from the 70's were low contrast and below any brand name of the time. ... And there are those who recommend the "big" names in microscopy without entirely stepping other scopes into the ground. ... You are asking about the differences between a $500 and $5000 scope, one made by Swift and the other one made by, for instance, Olympus. ...
    (sci.techniques.microscopy)
  • Re: Scope Quality Question
    ... And there are those who recommend the ... > "big" names in microscopy without entirely stepping other scopes into the ... > made by Swift and the other one made by, for instance, Olympus. ... it is not junk and actually useful for microscopy. ...
    (sci.techniques.microscopy)
  • Re: Scope Quality Question
    ... The Japanese Swift company did make some fairly good scopes but mostly for the low end student market. ... You can still do a great deal with the scope just don't play in the diatom game form pond life with digital cameras you can hold your own you will need to learn to do a bit more with software to enhance you contrast and hide and flaw but for most work you can do as well as most of and better than some if you try. ... Why don't you join us on the Yahoo microscope group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/ ...
    (sci.techniques.microscopy)
  • Re: Scope Quality Question
    ... What scopes are recommended by this group? ... And there are those who recommend the ... I will now assume that your Swift is as well built as my old PZO from 1975. ... it is not junk and actually useful for microscopy. ...
    (sci.techniques.microscopy)
  • Re: Celestron NexStar 80 vs Firstscope 76
    ... >I believe that it is entirely safe to recommend any of the high-end ... someone who is considering a couple of inexpensive 80mm refractors. ... Do the mirrors in these scopes compare favorably to Carl Zambuto mirrors? ... The other day Mike Spooner ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)