Re: Scope Quality Question
- From: Charles <ckraft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 03:57:04 GMT
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 07:42:30 GMT, "GTO" <gregor_o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>That's about the age of my old PZO scope. Then my assumption might be pretty
>accurate that your Swift is similar to my PZO in mechanical quality. Does it
>have a monocular (one eye) tubus with Achromat lenses (4x,10x,40x,100x/oil),
>a condenser and a simple illuminator with a frosted glass?
>
>If it's 25 years old, I do not think that it was made in China. Kevin?
>
>Gregor
>
Mine says series 950.
(probably a 952B)
Monocular
4X 0.15
10X 0.25
40X 0.65 (microplan)
eyepiece W10X 15.5MM
frosted illuminator
On the illuminator it says made in Japan.
IIRC I asked at the time I ordered it for upgraded optics and paid
extra.
all dry, no oil.
I'm mostly curious how much I would see better with a better
instrument. Maybe none. My most sever problem is not knowing what I
am looking at. Pond bugs and algae, mostly. I recently tried to
identify goldfish/koi parasites, but I don't know what they look like
except from reading about them in a book.
I have a low power binocular instrument I got from Cole-Parmer, their
brand, made in China. It seems good to me.
--
Charles
Does not play well with others.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scope Quality Question
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: Scope Quality Question
- References:
- Scope Quality Question
- From: Charles
- Re: Scope Quality Question
- From: GTO
- Re: Scope Quality Question
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: Scope Quality Question
- From: GTO
- Re: Scope Quality Question
- From: Charles
- Re: Scope Quality Question
- From: GTO
- Scope Quality Question
- Prev by Date: Re: microtome
- Next by Date: Re: WTB Long Working Distance Micro/macroscope
- Previous by thread: Re: Scope Quality Question
- Next by thread: Re: Scope Quality Question
- Index(es):