Re: Kohler illumination question...
- From: "GTO" <gregor_o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 02:38:00 GMT
Do you use very low-power objectives (2x to 6x)? If yes, keep the frosted
glass. Koehler illumination, as implemented by most manufactures, offers
rather poor even illumination when very low-power objectives are used. For
my Ortholux, I take the frosted glass out for high-power objectives (40x to
100x) and add one for "very low-power" work.
For sake of simplicity, just keep the frosted glass in the light path.
Taking it out may cause more problems than create visible improvements.
Gregor
"David Sontag" <acudoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hslt61pf4uqgqjbh7bk01t8it56eeljr1q@xxxxxxxxxx
> So let me get this ... I have a Leica DMLS... and yes there is a peice
> of frosted glass ... I never like it ...cuts down on available
> light.... So lets say I take it out ... then what??
>
> Thanks
>
> David
>
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:41:34 -0400, Andy Resnick
> <andy.resnick@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>justbeats wrote:
>>> Given that the final step is to hide it behind frosted glass, why is it
>>> necessary to get a focussed image of the lamp filament when setting up
>>> for Kohler illumination?
>>>
>>> I tried to answer this myself by taking images at different powers with
>>> the filament defocussed to varying degrees. I couldn't detect any
>>> difference in final image quality for any of the settings (as long as
>>> the filament remains nicely centered of course).
>>>
>>> After unsuccessfully Googling for the answer, I've another (maybe
>>> related) question. Is critical illumination considered an old and
>>> inferior technique, or a modern and superior one?
>>
>>Well... the semi-obvious thing to do is remove the frosted glass.
>>Truth is, the manufacturers put it (or a similar diffracting element) in
>>the beam to pacify people who don't know how to properly align a scope.
>> Honestly, or at least that's what my sales rep told me. So I make
>>sure to remove it as a matter of practice.
>>
>>Critical illumination, for all practical purposes, is functionally
>>identical to Kohler illumination. Both maximize throughput, both
>>maximize the "performance" of the illumination system, etc. etc. Some
>>people like critical, most prefer Kohler. Critical illumination
>>generally means one ends up examining a magnified image of the bulb
>>filament. (Guess which I prefer?)
>>
>>Hope this helps....
>
.
- References:
- Kohler illumination question...
- From: justbeats
- Re: Kohler illumination question...
- From: Andy Resnick
- Re: Kohler illumination question...
- From: David Sontag
- Kohler illumination question...
- Prev by Date: Re: Kohler illumination question...
- Next by Date: Re: Immunofluorescence and Confocal Microscopy Protocols and Informa
- Previous by thread: Re: Kohler illumination question...
- Next by thread: Re: Kohler illumination question...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|