Re: WTB Long Working Distance Micro/macroscope
- From: "Dan Fromm" <danielwfromm@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 May 2005 05:31:18 -0700
Gordon Couger wrote:
> George wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Apr 2005 20:59:41 +0200, "Klaus D Schmitt"
> > <kds315@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I should have been more precise:
> >>
> >>The lens I am looking for is a macroscopic lens for SLR and
> 16mm Film
> >>applications, not a microscope lens. It will be used to
> capture rare and
> >>very
> >>sensitive animals up to 1/8" and smaller from great distance.
> >>
> >>The intended magnification range is between 0.1x and max. 3x,
> the lens
> >>has to have a built in aperture (iris) to control Depth of
> Field (DOF).
> >>
> >>All the types I mentioned have this ability
> >>
> >>Thanks to Kevin & Aaron!
> >>
> >>Klaus
> >
> >
> > I forgot to say that with a short FL of the objective you
> will obtain
> > a greather magnification than with a long FL.
> >
> > With 8 X binoculars and an objective of 200 mm of FL, you
> will obtain
> > 10 X and the distance of the objective from the sample will
> be the FL,
> > then 200 mm.
> >
> > If you use a compact porro prism binoculars, you could obtain a
> > stereoscopic microscope.
> >
> > George
> > giocar3ABC@xxxxxxxxx
> > Remove A B C
>
> You might try a low powered eyepiece and short tube microscope
> with a low power objective. In a piece for Miscape
> www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/artjan03/gcshorttube.html Using a
> 1x Leitz Plan on 80 mm tube with a 10x objective I got about
> 100mm working distance and 12.5 mm Leitz Photar that belonged to
> Charley Meyer sowed promise with a eyepiece and it has an Iris.
>
> I don't know if you could find a combination of lens eyepiece
> and tube length that would give the 200 mm working distance but
> a less expensive lens would be cine lenses with reversed coated
> Kodak Ektars leading the pack.
>
> Gordon
> Gordon Couger
>
> I collect links on information related to light microscopes.
> www.couger.com/microscope/links/gclinks.html
> Please forward anything you think might be useful to others.
> Microscope Documentation is at www.science-info.org
Gordon, I don't think using a reversed Cine Ektar will get much working
distance at all. Remember that the C-mount flange-to-film distance is
17.52 mm. That's slightly more than the lens' minimum working distance
because, at least for my 15 mm and 25 mm CEs, the rear element
protrudes behind the flange.
Cheers,
Dan
.
- References:
- Re: WTB Long Working Distance Micro/macroscope
- From: Gordon Couger
- Re: WTB Long Working Distance Micro/macroscope
- Prev by Date: Re: Richardson Test Slide - cheaper equivalents?
- Next by Date: Bought a spencer on e-bay, what is it?
- Previous by thread: Re: WTB Long Working Distance Micro/macroscope
- Next by thread: Re: microtome
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|