Re: Canon 20Da - Interesting potential for photomicrography?
- From: "GTO" <gregor_o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 23:48:06 GMT
Yes. The small pixel size is one of the weaknesses of these new image
sensors when used for extreme low-light photography. But they are getting
better in handling noise. Mostly, post processing in firmware is applied.
Gregor
"justbeats" <steve_beats@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1118357490.086049.224470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Guys,
>
> aren't the pixels on these consumer cams just way too small to be
> useful? Every formula I can find shows them undersized by a factor of 4
> (at least) for any practical purposes.
>
> Cheers
> Beats
>
> PS. But an "old fashioned" 10D in binned mode works great for me.
>
.
- References:
- Canon 20Da - Interesting potential for photomicrography?
- From: David Littlewood
- Re: Canon 20Da - Interesting potential for photomicrography?
- From: GTO
- Re: Canon 20Da - Interesting potential for photomicrography?
- From: justbeats
- Canon 20Da - Interesting potential for photomicrography?
- Prev by Date: Re: Canon 20Da - Interesting potential for photomicrography?
- Next by Date: Re: Richardson Test Slide - cheaper equivalents?
- Previous by thread: Re: Canon 20Da - Interesting potential for photomicrography?
- Next by thread: [ FAR ot ] near sighted with astigmatism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|