Re: Photomicrography ... objective questions (and general advice)





frances_0119 wrote:
> I am considering purchasing a microscope for photomicrography (with a
> Canon 300d). I am currently looking at Zeiss(Axiostar Plus) and
> Nikon(E200). I'm leaning toward Nikon because I would have the chance
> to try the scope out before purchase and have a local salesperson to
> contact with any problems. With Zeiss, I would order online. I was
> orignally planning to spend around $1500 but anticapate spending a bit
> more than that, after looking at prices.
>
> My main concern is "what objectives to purchase" ... I'm trying to
> balance quality with affordability.
>
> My hope is to be able to try out the Nikon with my camera, and also
> with different "class" objectives. From what information I could gain
> from the saleslady - I could only get a quote on a particular scope
> instead of a comprehensive parts/price listing - the "standard" Nikon
> achromat objectives aren't very good. She suggested the next step up
> (still achromat) but was confident that I did not need
> semi-apochromatic objectives. Regular apochromats are out of my price
> range.
>
> So, my question is - what types of images would be best to show the
> differences between acrhomat and semi-apochromatic objectives?
> Differences that would show up in photographs, especially?
>
> I don't want to spend a lot of money on a microscope only to find,
> later, that the cheaper objectives aren't suitable for photography. I
> also don't want to spend more money than necessary, especially to get
> started. But I want photographs with good color/optical quality.
>
> Any general advice is most welcome, too! I've just found an Olympus
> dealer close by, so I'll probably be considering their microscopes as
> well.
>
> Thanks,
> ~frances

I'm just a hobbiest--- I have a Zeiss Axiostar, with a
recently-acquired Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT camera. Here are my
thoughts as an amateur:
-There's no such thing as lenses absolutely "working or not working"
for photograpy, based solely on color-correction level. Plan apo's
will give a better image than semi-apo's, which in turn will give a
better image than achromats. However, achromats can produce some nice
images---it all depends on what you're photographing, what your
expectations/needs are, and how big your checkbook is. The central
portion of an achromat's field of view can be a good image--crop out
the peripheral area's, and voila!
-If a serious desease of mine were being diagnosed, I'd want Zeiss plan
apo's with gold barrels and diamond lenses; if I'm making snapshots of
paramicium races, achromats would be suitable; other uses, in between.
-My own choices, after some trial-and-error?? I'm using phase
plan-achromats for my hobby photos (a good mix of cost/performance). I
think plan lenses are worth the money, since a photograph's
field-of-view shows edge detail more prominently than when viewed
through an eyepiece (your attention is focused on the central area in
an eyepiece). APO's/Semi APO's represent too large a chunk of limited
funds, for marginal image imptovement--2% better images cost 70% more
money?!?. I'd much rather spend those funds on other accessories, ie.,
phase contrast and darkfield systems, trinocular photo-tubes, remote
shutter release accessories, right-angle viewfinder for SLR camera,
books, and items that expand, simplify and enhance the photo process.
-Like many hobbies/endeavers, the deeper you get into it, the deeper
you get!!! Lenses, while obviously of fundamental importance, are only
the iceberg's tip, in the process of enjoyable photomicrography.
-Good Luck!!! And never stray too far from your checkbook...
Bob Marable

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Zeiss ICM 405
    ... What you have is a very fine metalograph, an inverted microscope ... one you have uses bottom up lighting while the others use top down ... There were two different sets of objectives offerred by Zeiss for ... and another polarizing filter before the light reaches the binoculars. ...
    (sci.techniques.microscopy)
  • Re: Nikon D70 DSLR on microscope: Update
    ... >setup, which is parfocal with the objectives, the D70 oversamples the image ... >factor of 0.5x is recommended but such a relay lens can be rather expensive. ... I've been trying to use a Nikon microscope adapter (containing relay ...
    (sci.techniques.microscopy)
  • Re: How many pixels?
    ... needed for some common objectives.. ... of the microscope onto the CCD increases that demand. ... the NA per unit magnification of various objectives that I own. ... approximate number of resolved pixels in the exit pupil as 0.64 Megapixels. ...
    (sci.techniques.microscopy)
  • Re: Newcommer Seeks Advice Re Microscope Purchases Made
    ... I don't need another microscope, ... The Universal uses the older 160mm tube length objectives, ... However the 160mm lenses are older, ... Zeiss, ...
    (sci.techniques.microscopy)
  • Re: Nikon Stereo Zoom system
    ... Leica website has a complete set of catalogs with all the specs at ... ergonomic features, objectives, eyepieces and photo ports.. ... achromats and outstanding plan apos. ... >Gary Gaugler, Ph.D. ...
    (sci.techniques.microscopy)