Which microscope is better?
- From: "noname" <noname@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:28:21 +0200
Hello,
I am planning to buy a microscope and I am considering the following 2
models:
Nikon
TypeYS 100
Objectieven 4x, 10x, 40x, 100x Oil
Oculairen 10x
Condensor Condensor met diafragma
Tafel: Kruistafel met coaxiale bediening rechts
Revolver: 4-voudig
Verlichting: Ingebouwde regelbare verlichting
Bijzonderheden: Zwaar statief met ergonomisch geplaatste grof-
en fijn-instelknoppen
and:
Leitz binoculaire microscoop
Type: SM - Lux
Objectieven: Achromaat 10x0,20 , PL 40x0,65 , PL.Apo. 100x1.32
Oculairen: 2 stuks Periplan 10x18 brildragers
Condensor: Condensor met klaplens 0,9
Tafel: Kruistafel met coaxiale bediening links
Revolver: 4 voudig
Verlichting: Ingebouwde regelbare Köhler verlichting
My question is simple, can someone tell me which one is the best to buy?
The Leitz is the most expensive one, but also the most old one.
Thanks.
Regards,
BlueICEz
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which microscope is better?
- From: Gordon Couger
- Re: Which microscope is better?
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: Which microscope is better?
- From: GTO
- Re: Which microscope is better?
- Next by Date: about the Leitz Vario Orthomat camera
- Next by thread: Re: Which microscope is better?
- Index(es):