Re: Cooled CCD cameras - Recommendations?
- From: Gary G <see.signature@bottom>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 20:36:27 -0800
On 29 Nov 2005 00:27:45 -0800, "justbeats" <steve_beats@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>> The un-cooled cameras will take excellent pix with just ambient light.
>
>That's an interesting point...
>
>What effect does "ambient" light have on resolution compared to (say)
>Kohler illumination? Similar to darkfield or oblique illumination I
>guess?
>
> Cheers
> Beats
The issue here is that the camera can make a "decent" image using only
room light rather than formal illumination. It will auto color
correct. With dry 40X and lower mag objectives, the results are good.
Certainly, using a condenser is better than ambient light. The point
is/was to show how sensitive the camera is. There is no suggestion
that using this camera would eliminate a condenser.
Gary Gaugler, Ph.D.
Microtechnics, Inc.
Granite Bay, CA 95746
916.791.8191
gary@microtechnics dot com
.
- References:
- Cooled CCD cameras - Recommendations?
- From: hbarwood
- Re: Cooled CCD cameras - Recommendations?
- From: Gary G
- Re: Cooled CCD cameras - Recommendations?
- From: Gary G
- Re: Cooled CCD cameras - Recommendations?
- From: justbeats
- Cooled CCD cameras - Recommendations?
- Prev by Date: Re: Cooled CCD cameras - Recommendations?
- Previous by thread: Re: Cooled CCD cameras - Recommendations?
- Next by thread: Re: Cooled CCD cameras - Recommendations?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|