Re: Inverted fluo for cell culture: Olympus, Zeiss or China ?
- From: David <sipka1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:17:47 -0700
David wrote:
I need to decide in 1 month time horizon how much to spend from a double digit budget on a new microscope for my new lab. The budget was originally planned for Accuscope 3031 plus digital camera but in the meantime I got to use RT Spot one shot 1.5M camera (older model 2.2.2) So I would want now to spend all my grant equipment money on the scope. (BTW does anybody know, if this comes from "my" grant budget, is it customary that if I potentially change institution in the future, I can take the scope with me [providing that my current institution did not contribute to the purchase] as a part of "my" lab?
So the problem is that the budget was plenty for the Accuscope but seems to not reach the level of Olympus IX51 or Zeiss Axiovert 40 (for the latter, I have not seen the $$$ numbers)
My needs are to document presence of specific antigens during cell life, mostly DAPI, FITC/Alexa 488 and TR/Rhodamine or similar. The ability to expose all three is important for me. I may omit 40x eyepiece for now. I also have access to nearby (30min) state of the art scope if I need really outstanding picture.
The IX51 looks like a solid platform, has infinity optics, filter (5?) turret, fluorite LD eyepieces. It is however several grands above my budget so as I would have to become somehow inventive or bow deeply at certain $$ sources at work, success not guaranteed.
The Axiovert may be less, I will get the quote soon. It seems to be a step down on the construction, more akin the IX41 line by Olympus. This may however not be important in normal use. From what I gathered, it has only two positions for the filters. I know, there is the triple filter made by Zeiss.. The supplied A-plan objectives seem to be again lower than the Fluorites from Olympus. Maybe I could afford to upgrade the objectives and have a good middle of the road scope.
I heard bad comments about the Accuscope so I do not look anymore that direction, I would probably do better on some used scope like that Zeiss IM on Labx.
Please advise.
David
Just to follow-up with you, the final decision has been for Olympus IX-51 with 4x, 10x and 20x fluorite semi-apos objectives and three superselective hard-coat (98%) cubes. This pushed the total several grands above the original plan but I have been allowed to tap other part of the grant. I should have nice Christmas toy ;-)
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Microscope recommendation
- Next by Date: Re: microscope for bacteriology ( lomo or leica )
- Previous by thread: microscope for bacteriology ( lomo or leica )
- Next by thread: Zeiss Lens nomenclature/relative merit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading