Re: Numerical aperarure vs Magnificatrion was[Re: 40X or more?]

Aaron wrote:
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:40:17 -0600, Richard Owlett
<rowlett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Kevin Cunningham wrote:

"Deboz" <RollinOnTwelvs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1143252741.226364.209750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


I was just wondering what experience others have had with microscopy.
Is it worth it to go to 100X plus?



GTO makes a good point. Also don't use magnification, you should use Numerical Aperature.

Kevin Cunningham
SMS



What does one have to do with other?
Naive Google search gives no answer.


Hi

Start at this website

http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/

and search any terms having to do with microscopes. The is the"
mother of all encyclopedia articles" on microscopy.

Aaron

WOW
You modified the old proverb re "teach a man to fish" by adding "and where to fish" :)
Thanks

.