Re: More on A.pellucida
- From: "rene" <renevanwezel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jan 2007 00:30:17 -0800
Kevin, yes, I might have been too sharp in this discussion, might
refllect my state of mind these months.
Anyway, like for like, a 40x BF or in DF shouldn't suffer in
resolution. I achieved DF with a 70x objective with the full aperture
of 1.23 by relatively simple means (a patched aplanatic 1.4 condenser).
The view in DF is *very* detailed, see my yahoo photo album for an
example. DF is just not very practical for most specimen, especially
not in high NA. And, I agree with Gregor, even for diatoms I prefer COL
over DF.
René.
.
- References:
- More on A.pellucida
- From: NoSpam
- Re: More on A.pellucida
- From: rene
- Re: More on A.pellucida
- From: gto
- Re: More on A.pellucida
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: More on A.pellucida
- From: rene
- Re: More on A.pellucida
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- More on A.pellucida
- Prev by Date: Re: Pyrex glass coverslip
- Next by Date: Re: Pyrex glass coverslip
- Previous by thread: Re: More on A.pellucida
- Next by thread: Re: More on A.pellucida
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
