Re: New microscope for DIC brightfield and darkfield imaging
- From: runarwh@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Apr 2007 01:49:29 -0700
The 5Mpix makes sense only at low magnification. Part of our work is
documentation and quality control, where lower magnification (5x, 10x,
20x) will give a trade-off between spatial resolution and larger field
of view. For the details we use 100x objectives, but then we don't
need the 5mpix. However we don't want more than one camera on the
microscope.
Does anyone has comments on the objectives? Olympus use plan
fluorites. Nikon does not use this term anymore, but claims that the
optical performance is the same and that they have moved away from the
term "fluorite" after they changed some processes? Nikon claims that
their objectives are better than the Olympus plan fluorites.
On Apr 17, 10:29 am, heini <buerg...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi,
I am not familiar with color photography in microscopy.. as a
fluorescence microscopy user I alwas use B/W cameras.
So first question: what magnifications do you use? 5 Mpxis far too
much if you want to go real close. Good, that these cameras do have
binning at least. I posted a calculation explaining why more than 2
mpx make hardly sense in light microscopy in this forum before.
(considering you are using objectives higher than ~40x)
Maybe check out Pixelink, too.
yours, Heinrich
Cameras: CIII (Olympus AnalySIS) or Qimaging micropublisher (ImagePro/
Nikon)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New microscope for DIC brightfield and darkfield imaging
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: New microscope for DIC brightfield and darkfield imaging
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: New microscope for DIC brightfield and darkfield imaging
- Next by Date: Re: New microscope for DIC brightfield and darkfield imaging
- Previous by thread: Re: New microscope for DIC brightfield and darkfield imaging
- Next by thread: Re: New microscope for DIC brightfield and darkfield imaging
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading