Re: Correction collar not working

Dear Satoru,

The correction collar is for correcting the coverslip thickness.

Putting a slide onto the stage and adjusting the correction collar for
the measured thickness of the coverslip and focussing for best detail
NO change is observed when rotating the correction collar.

Best focus by fine adjustment is independent of chosen collar position.
In other words there is no perceptible response to collar rotation.

Mounting a non-collar objective of the same magnification, but slightly
smaller aperture next to the objective in question and comparing images
looking at the same detail, an image of somewhat better contrast and re-
solution is obtained viewing through the objective without collar.

Thanks for your thoughts.

G.R.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Satoru Uzawa" <satoru_unospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: sci.techniques.microscopy
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: Correction collar not working


Is the correction collar for compemsating for difference in coverslip
thickness?
Or somthing else, like different mounting media? One easy way to see the
effect
of correction collar is to measure the PSF. I would say it's a lens with
good
design since the correction collar is not shifting the focus.

What are you expecting the correction collar to do??
How are you evaluating the image "quality"?

My suggestion is the measure coverslip thickness and use that value to
set the
correction collar, then measure the PSF (assuming that the correction
collar is
for the compensating the coverslip thickness variation).

Good luck!

Satoru

NoSpam <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Group,

Today I have a question regarding a mechanical-optical malfunction of
a microscope objective made by a major manufacturer.

The objective is a 40x, Plan Apo with correction collar.

Focussing on a slide one obtains a relatively good image, not as good
as one would expect, but acceptably good. What is curious is that ro-
tating the correction collar throughout its range produces no change in
focus.

An explanation on what might be going on?

Thank you
G.R.



"Satoru Uzawa" <satoru_unospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f3212o$2n5m$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is the correction collar for compemsating for difference in coverslip
thickness?
Or somthing else, like different mounting media? One easy way to see the
effect
of correction collar is to measure the PSF. I would say it's a lens with
good
design since the correction collar is not shifting the focus.

What are you expecting the correction collar to do??
How are you evaluating the image "quality"?

My suggestion is the measure coverslip thickness and use that value to
set the
correction collar, then measure the PSF (assuming that the correction
collar is
for the compensating the coverslip thickness variation).

Good luck!

Satoru

NoSpam <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Group,

Today I have a question regarding a mechanical-optical malfunction of
a microscope objective made by a major manufacturer.

The objective is a 40x, Plan Apo with correction collar.

Focussing on a slide one obtains a relatively good image, not as good
as one would expect, but acceptably good. What is curious is that ro-
tating the correction collar throughout its range produces no change in
focus.

An explanation on what might be going on?

Thank you
G.R.




.

Relevant Pages