Re: structured illumination options
- From: "Kevin Cunningham" <smskjv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:41:33 GMT
"ezkcdude" <zamir.evan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1180547585.375227.250010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello, all. I'm new to this board, and am starting my own lab next
year. I'm curious about what it would take, in terms of cost, to get a
scope outfitted with structured illumination (like the Zeiss Apotome).
The bulk of my imaging needs are low-mag (10,20X), widefield
epifluorescence. Just wondering if any of you have some advice, or
have tried it out yourself. Thanks, in advance.
Dude, the Apotome is a wonder and a marvel and quite expensive. All Zeiss
is quite expensive but this is really quite expensive. You might find it of
little use at relatively low power but I would ask for a demo and see what
it does for you. Take a look at a good DIC system if your using unstained
specimens.
For your use have you thought about a high end stereo like the Olympus SX16
stereo. There are fluorescence accesories for that 'scope or the AR1000
from Nikon. Just a thought.
Thanks,
Kevin Cunningham
SMS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: structured illumination options
- From: ezkcdude
- Re: structured illumination options
- References:
- structured illumination options
- From: ezkcdude
- structured illumination options
- Prev by Date: structured illumination options
- Next by Date: Re: structured illumination options
- Previous by thread: structured illumination options
- Next by thread: Re: structured illumination options
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|