Re: structured illumination options
- From: ezkcdude <zamir.evan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 May 2007 14:52:20 -0700
On May 30, 3:41 pm, "Kevin Cunningham" <sms...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"ezkcdude" <zamir.e...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1180547585.375227.250010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello, all. I'm new to this board, and am starting my own lab next
year. I'm curious about what it would take, in terms of cost, to get a
scope outfitted with structured illumination (like the Zeiss Apotome).
The bulk of my imaging needs are low-mag (10,20X), widefield
epifluorescence. Just wondering if any of you have some advice, or
have tried it out yourself. Thanks, in advance.
Dude, the Apotome is a wonder and a marvel and quite expensive. All Zeiss
is quite expensive but this is really quite expensive. You might find it of
little use at relatively low power but I would ask for a demo and see what
it does for you. Take a look at a good DIC system if your using unstained
specimens.
For your use have you thought about a high end stereo like the Olympus SX16
stereo. There are fluorescence accesories for that 'scope or the AR1000
from Nikon. Just a thought.
Thanks,
Kevin Cunningham
SMS
Thanks, Kevin. When you say "expensive", it's all relative of course.
My startup is not chump change, so if we're talking $30,000, I may
look into it. Above $50,000 is likely a deal-breaker. Can you wink or
nod an answer here?
-evan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: structured illumination options
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: structured illumination options
- References:
- structured illumination options
- From: ezkcdude
- Re: structured illumination options
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- structured illumination options
- Prev by Date: Re: structured illumination options
- Next by Date: Re: FA Vintage Popular Microscope microscopy manual 1895
- Previous by thread: Re: structured illumination options
- Next by thread: Re: structured illumination options
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|