Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- From: Gary G <see.signature@bottom>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:50:07 -0800
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:12:35 GMT, "Kevin Cunningham"
<smskjv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
Allow me to disagree with you. Magnification was not used by some makers
including Zeiss until approximately 1905. They used A, B, C, etc. While
mag is an easy way to point out what objective you are discussing it still
doesn't say much about what the obejctive does.
My training was primarly from Zeiss. Their point is well taken, NA gives
you resolution, there is no other way to define resolution, see Abbes
equations.
Now minor points, you aren't supposed to use variable NA objectives with
Nomarski. Olympus doesn't build a 60X that really works with their
Nomarski, I tried.
Thanks,
Kevin Cunningham
SMS
Perhaps you should get some Olympus training. I have UPlanFL/60 and
UPlanAPO/60 and both have been working perfectly with DIC for over
five years. Am I doing something wrong so that it works??
UPlanFL has variable NA.
Kiss French. Drink California.
gary at gaugler dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- References:
- Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- From: justbeats
- Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- From: Perl
- Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- From: Perl
- Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- From: NoSpam
- Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- From: justbeats
- Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- From: NoSpam
- Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- From: NoSpam
- Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- From: NoSpam
- Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- Prev by Date: Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- Next by Date: Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- Previous by thread: Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- Next by thread: Re: DIC On An Amateur Budget
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|