Re: Open Microscopy Initiatives?

On Feb 11, 4:07 am, heini <buerg...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Sorry, I got it wrong.
I thought you were looking for a new microscope at the first hand.
for a standardized interface I must admit that I am not a friend of
standards in R&D.
I rather prefer a broad palette of manufacturers and parts, even if
they are not always exchangeable.
You refer to HTML as a standard.
Well, the good thing about HTML is that most texts are readable even
if the people using it don't care about these standards. By the way,
you have alternatives like pdf, ghostscript, doc, rtf, odf, printed
books...
I srongly disagree with your idea, that any government, -especially
the US government- should control how to steer my microscope.
All good standards like DIN and later ISO come from the industry side.
(It was an american craftman's  idea to standardize screws, if you
shouldn't know, and not the idea of any government). The good thing
about these standards is, that you get standard, when you buy, but you
needn't to buy standard.
So a standardizing initiative must come from users or from industry.
Now the first thing to do would be to define a standard.
Believe me, every enterprise building hardware has predefined
standards.
And standards can be subject to changes. (We have HTML version 3, by
the way...) This is what you can see, when an obsolete interface is
removed from a microscope.
These people even provide you with documentation? So they have
standards!
But I don't want microscopes standardized to the freeze as I don't
want standardized cars, because this is the best way to stop
development.
Remember the rules of evolution and keep in mind the diversity...
We have enough standards like NA, light intensity, coverslip thickness
is standardized by DIN, didn't you know? So all the things that have
to be interchangeable  -the specimens- can be moved from one
microscope to another. Ther rest is "gusto" and competition and I hope
it will stay like this.

yours, heini

Heini, it still sounds to me like you think I want standardized
hardware. That is not the case. The standard would be a software
interface. To my knowledge, none of these manufacturers use their
proprietary software interface as a selling point for their
microscopes. All these SDK's perform essentially the same tasks (eg
move stage, open/close shutter, change filtersets, focus, etc, etc),
yet use different code, perhaps even different languages. I would
argue that there is not a single purchase made based on how a SDK
specifies the stage is moved or a shutter is opened. Purchases are
made based on optics and hardware features. Of course, the
manufacturers would still create their own software to control the
microscopes. That wouldn't change. Also, I did not propose that the US
government create the standard - I would argue against that as well. I
would suggest a working group be formed consisting of university and
NIH scientists and representative from the major manufacturers of
microscopes (Leica, Olympus, Nikon, Zeiss), cameras (Hamamatsu,
QImaging, etc), motorized stages (Ludl, Prior, ASI) to come to
agreement on a common standard.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Open Microscopy Initiatives?
    ... I thought you were looking for a new microscope at the first hand. ... if the people using it don't care about these standards. ...
    (sci.techniques.microscopy)
  • Re: UL/ETL Choking the market
    ... standards ensuring real safety. ... design freedom the least possible, with descriptive, performance based ... Lucifer Lighting downlight in the US costs US$200, ... We now see Chinese manufacturers who can carry out ...
    (sci.engr.lighting)
  • Re: Resizing the Formatting Palette
    ... For me, Mac ... These are the user classes who could use a tailored interface. ... 'publisher and standards setter' ... should set standards they should follow. ...
    (microsoft.public.mac.office.word)
  • Re: PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices
    ... >For first, there is nothing like a CAM interface on Amiga, neither ... >As for AmigaOs, there's also nothing like a standardized SCSI ... > raw device interface than to CAM. ... > standards that are not the standards of the host. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Use of RP25 wheels in US H0 plastic steam RTR locos
    ... I therefore wanted to check if this really is true, and that the kids with their first train set having a steam loco with more that two axles can actually keep the RP25 wheels on metals. ... It seems that the difference between MOROP's NEM and NMRA's standards is that in Europe NEM tries to follow the manufacturers factory standards but in US manufacturers try to follow NMRA standards... ...
    (rec.models.railroad)
Quantcast