Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: Kevin Cunningham <smskjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 07:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 25, 9:50 am, Essaouira <javiermr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 20 mar, 12:25, Kevin Cunningham <sms...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 18, 3:14 pm, Essaouira <javiermr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
I've not found ratings or reviews about this miscroscope. Anyone has
experiences with it?.
Thank you
Javier M. Rico
I've worked on a few and their complete crap. Poorly designed, poorly
made, crap.
Thanks,
Kevin Cunningham
SMS
Thank you very much.
And the Reichert Microstar IV?. Is it good?.
Essaouira
Sorry, the single worst microscope ever produced. It killed of the
production of microscopes in America. I'd avoid this "microscope"
like the plague. You kinda lucky to find one, they have just about
all died.
Try to find an instrument made by Zeiss, the real one, Leitz, Olympus
or Nikon. Sometimes you can find a Wild compound or an AO (either a
10 or a 110), they are all good.
Thanks,
Kevin Cunningham
SMS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: Essaouira
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- References:
- Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: Essaouira
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: Essaouira
- Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- Prev by Date: Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- Next by Date: Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- Previous by thread: Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- Next by thread: Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|