Re: Zeiss Photomicroscope III and MC-63(a)

gentlemen, I appreciate your recommendation to go digital, but I would like
to point out, that compared to a well done 4x5 inch micrograph, a digital
micrograph is usually inferior (just try it ). And regarding film and
processing - no problem at all here in Austria - everything readily
available!
but thanks for your reply, if I had enough money to buy a digital medium
format back, I would go for it (in parallel)
rgds
Georg Nyman


"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:21fe1b38-1503-4edc-a8d4-08458cfc092b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mar 19, 8:44 pm, Gary G <see.signature@bottom> wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:07:36 +0100, "Dr. Georg N.Nyman"

<gnny...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
A question - can someone tell me what I would need to add a MC-63(a) on
top
of the PhotomicIII? What intermediate tube, what optics would be
required?
Or would you have a better idea to take 4x5 inch micrographs on the
PmicIII?
Thanks
G.Nyman

Why would you fool around with these items? I dumped MC-63 bodies and
MC-100 controllers since there was no interest in film.

Go digital.

Kiss French. Drink California.

gary at gaugler dot com

Couldn't agree more! Were would you get film and processing?

Kevin Cunningham
SMS


.