Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: Essaouira <javiermrico@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
On 4 abr, 19:34, Kevin Cunningham <sms...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 4, 10:31 am, Essaouira <javiermr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 4 abr, 10:56, heini <buerg...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi essaaouria,
I still don't get the clue...
you are asking for a good microscope but you are jumping between new
infinity corrected cheaper ones
and old 160mm or 170 mm corrected microscopes older than me and
probably you are....
If you want good colours you should look for a newer Olympus. I would
not consider a Zeiss standard or junior after I looked through a BZ50.
If you are a medical student, then a modern Will should be OK. I
slightly disagree with Kevin here, they are not all crap exceply for
the inverted ones. These ARE crap, don't touch them because they are
shaky. You will become seasick....
If you want to work with the microscope you should consider more
modern ones. Actally, it looks tempting to buy a Junior for 150.-,
there are tons of spare parts available, but these microscopes are
cheap because they are not state of the art. Cave, many "Juniors" are
offered as "Standard" on ebay just because someone made them
binocular.
And remember, most parts out there are some 30-40 years old!
If you want to look at insects, then none of these microscopes would
be suitable for you. Insects don't fit under the objectives and can't
be illuminated.
Tell us a bit about your intentions and your budget and we might be
able to push you in the right direction.
yours,
heini
Thank you,
I am a serious amateur, I want a modular microscope that I can use for
a variety of applications, such as phase contrast, fluorescence,
darkfield, etc. My budget is around 350-400 EURO. The mail goal is
modularity, as I would surely like to expand possibilities.
Greetings
I'd look for a used Olympus CH series or a Nikon Alphaphot. Good
machine at a good price. They are not Kohler illuminated but I don't
think it will matter.
Thanks,
Kevin Cunningham
SMS
Maybe an Olympus BH-2?
Thanks all
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: heini
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- References:
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: Essaouira
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: Essaouira
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: heini
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: Essaouira
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- Prev by Date: Re: Zeiss Photomicroscope III correction?
- Next by Date: Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- Previous by thread: Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- Next by thread: Re: Zeiss Jena Laboval good microscope
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|