Re: Motic, Bresser
- From: Kevin Cunningham <smskjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 05:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 1, 4:17 pm, "IW2GNB" <i...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks to all for the answers.
I believed a new microscope, if of decent quality, is normally better than a
old (25+ years) one even of big brands because of technology development in
optics...
Your right if you willing to buy one of the big four brands. They
make great instruments. Buy any thing else and you on your own. I
just fixed a cheezy cheapo microscope for a customer, well, it wasn't
really repairable but I made it less crappy than it was. They needed
it for the three weeks until their parts got here. It was a
frustrating job on a microscope with no design and darn few working
optics.
Maybe yours will work, ya never know!
Thanks,
Kevin Cunningham
SMS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Motic, Bresser
- From: IW2GNB
- Re: Motic, Bresser
- References:
- Re: Motic, Bresser
- From: IW2GNB
- Re: Motic, Bresser
- Prev by Date: Re: Caring for microscopes
- Next by Date: Re: Caring for microscopes
- Previous by thread: Re: Motic, Bresser
- Next by thread: Re: Motic, Bresser
- Index(es):