Re: Which SEM??
- From: birerozgur@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 23, 5:06 am, Gary G <see.signature@bottom> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:29:58 -0700 (PDT), bireroz...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Greetings,
We are considering buying a high-end SEM for a central lab which will
study materials, both conducting and non-conducting. I am wondering
about individual experiences regarding the microscope performances and
company support. I am inclined to think the comparable products of
FEI, JEOL, Zeiss etc are all very good indeed. Furthermore the users
of a certain product are almost always quite satisfied. So, if there
are experienced users who can provide comparisons, I'd appreciate it.
Best Regards
OzgurBirer
Re-name this to "why bother."
If such a big decision is to be made and the question is asked and
answered, why is there no response?
I can only conclude that these types of postings are rather useless.
They are for this topic, random. Go away. There are other venues.
Figure it out for yourself.
Kiss French. Drink California.
gary at gaugler dot com
Yes, it is a big decision and I am in no hurry. Therefore, before you
start spewing meaningless remarks, you should exercise a little self-
control. As I mentioned in the original message, it is for a central
lab where several researchers and students work. Therefore, the
possibility of ferrous materials cannot be completely ruled out. As
for the resolution, thank you very much, I know how to read a catalog
page. I simply asked for personal experiences...
Gosh!, some people really think the world rotates around them.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which SEM??
- From: Gary G
- Re: Which SEM??
- References:
- Which SEM??
- From: birerozgur
- Re: Which SEM??
- From: Gary G
- Which SEM??
- Prev by Date: Re: Which SEM??
- Next by Date: ** Boobie Breast Plate ARmOr ProTecTor ***
- Previous by thread: Re: Which SEM??
- Next by thread: Re: Which SEM??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
