Re: How to distinguish 160 vs 170 mm eypieces?
- From: Richard J Kinch <kinch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:44:09 -0600
Kevin Cunningham writes:
I wrote one of the books you use.
Let's see, Smith, Smith, Smith, Longhurst, Born, Wolfe, Kingslake, Twyman,
Driscoll, Vaughan, Jacobs, Chang, Murphy, Crisp, Zeiss, OSA, .... Which
one is yours again?
Eyepieces made by any one other than the manufacturer don't work.
Other than the minority of compensating designs, this is simply not true.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How to distinguish 160 vs 170 mm eypieces?
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: How to distinguish 160 vs 170 mm eypieces?
- References:
- How to distinguish 160 vs 170 mm eypieces?
- From: Theo Griep
- Re: How to distinguish 160 vs 170 mm eypieces?
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: How to distinguish 160 vs 170 mm eypieces?
- From: Neil B.
- Re: How to distinguish 160 vs 170 mm eypieces?
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: How to distinguish 160 vs 170 mm eypieces?
- From: Richard J Kinch
- Re: How to distinguish 160 vs 170 mm eypieces?
- From: Kevin Cunningham
- How to distinguish 160 vs 170 mm eypieces?
- Prev by Date: Leitz - DIC: why 1,25x nosepiece? And: Dialux or Orthoplan?
- Next by Date: Re: How to distinguish 160 vs 170 mm eypieces?
- Previous by thread: Re: How to distinguish 160 vs 170 mm eypieces?
- Next by thread: Re: How to distinguish 160 vs 170 mm eypieces?
- Index(es):