Re: Here is why; and confusing conclusions about tubelength

From: Richard J Kinch <kinch@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:09:01 -0600

Theo Griep writes:

I already found out (by trying some great Zeiss objectives on a good
Nikon microscope, giving a lousy image) that you shouldn't mix
objectives and eypieces from different brands.

This applies to certain combinations, not always, and less today than what
was made decades ago.
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Here is why; and confusing conclusions about tubelength
  - From: Theo Griep

References:
- 160mm objectives on Orthoplan: cut off the tube?
  - From: Theo Griep
- Here is why; and confusing conclusions about tubelength
  - From: Theo Griep
- Re: Here is why; and confusing conclusions about tubelength
  - From: Kevin Cunningham
- Re: Here is why; and confusing conclusions about tubelength
  - From: Theo Griep

Prev by Date: Re: 1/f = 1/v + 1/v'
Next by Date: Re: 1/f = 1/v + 1/v'
Previous by thread: Re: Here is why; and confusing conclusions about tubelength
Next by thread: Re: Here is why; and confusing conclusions about tubelength
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Here is why; and confusing conclusions about tubelength
... giving a lousy image) that you shouldn't mix ... objectives and eypieces from different brands. ...
(sci.techniques.microscopy)
Re: Would like advice on microscope purchase
... the only brands to ... > A word of caution about Leitz SM scopes: ... I think their optical tube length is 170mm; their objectives may be ... scope may not be sufficient for "short" objectives--I found out the ...
(sci.techniques.microscopy)